Sunday, 30 November 2025

When “Winning” matters more than being happy

 There’s something deeply unsettling about hearing a partner say they are miserable in a relationship, yet feel unable to leave. Not because of love, hope, or even fear of being alone, but because leaving would mean that someone else—an ex, a past critic—was “right.”

It’s a peculiar kind of emotional trap. One where the relationship itself becomes secondary, and the real battle is happening elsewhere: in the mind, in the past, and in the imagined judgment of another person.


The logic that keeps people stuck


To understand this mindset, it can help to step outside the emotional intensity of relationships and look at similar patterns in everyday situations:

 “I loved this shirt once. It doesn’t fit anymore, but I can’t donate it—because someone else might wear it.”

 “My taste has changed. I don’t like this anymore, but I can’t get rid of it because someone once said it wouldn’t suit me—and if I stop using it, they’ll be right.”- “I have this gadget. I don’t use it, it clutters my space, but I can’t give it away because someone who always wanted it might end up with it.”



In all these examples, the decision is no longer about usefulness, joy, or personal fit. It becomes about avoiding a perceived loss in a psychological competition.

The object, whether it’s a shirt, a gadget, or even a relationship, loses its intrinsic value. Instead, it becomes symbolic. A stand-in for pride, identity, or the need to not “lose.”


In our life, those are unhelpful thoughts. In this case, several cognitive distortions may be at play:


1. Personalization and External Validation

The decision to stay or leave is being filtered through someone else’s imagined reaction.

“If I leave, they win.”

This assumes that another person’s opinion defines reality—or worse, defines your worth.


2. All-or-Nothing Thinking

There’s an implicit binary: either I stay (and prove them wrong), or I leave (and they win).

In reality, relationships are complex. Ending something that no longer works is not a loss—it’s an adjustment.


3. Emotional Reasoning

Because it feels like losing, it must be losing.

But feelings are not always reliable indicators of truth. They often reflect underlying beliefs rather than objective reality.


4. Sunk Cost Fallacy

“I’ve invested so much—emotionally, mentally, maybe even publicly. I can’t walk away now.”

This keeps people tied to situations that no longer serve them, simply because of past investment.


5. Mind Reading and Projection

Assuming the ex is thinking, “I was right all along,” and that this thought has power or consequence.

In truth, we rarely know what others are thinking—and even if we did, why should it dictate our choices?


Why this pattern is unhelpful. At its core, this thinking pattern shifts the focus away from what actually matters:

- Are you happy?

- Is this relationship healthy?

- Is it meeting your emotional needs?

Instead, it centers on avoiding humiliation, proving a point and maintaining an image

The result is a kind of emotional self-abandonment. You stay—not because you want to, but because leaving feels like surrendering to someone else’s narrative.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: staying in misery doesn’t prove strength—it prolongs suffering.


What this thinking might be saying about you

If someone finds themselves stuck in this loop, it’s not a sign of weakness—it’s a clue.

This pattern may reflect:

A strong need for validation

There may be a deep desire to be seen as right, capable, or successful—especially in the eyes of someone who once doubted you.

Fear of judgment or shame

Leaving might feel like public failure, even if no one is actually watching or judging.

Identity tied to being “right”

If being correct—or proving others wrong—has become part of self-worth, then changing course can feel like losing a piece of identity.

Unresolved emotional attachment to the past

The ex is no longer physically present, but psychologically, they still hold influence. The relationship becomes less about the current partner and more about an unresolved story.

Difficulty tolerating ambiguity

Ending something without a clear “win” or “loss” can feel uncomfortable. It’s easier, in a way, to stay stuck in a known narrative.


What if leaving a relationship that no longer works isn’t “losing”?

What if it’s simply updating your life based on new information?


We outgrow clothes. We lose interest in gadgets. Our tastes evolve.

And relationships—perhaps more than anything—require alignment in the present, not justification from the past.

The healthier question isn’t:  “What will they think if I leave?”

But rather:  “What do I need in order to live honestly and well?”


When decisions are driven by the need to prove something to someone else, we hand over control of our lives to people who may no longer even be part of it.

Your choices don’t need to be arguments.

They don’t need to win against anyone.

They only need to make sense for you—here, now, as you are.

And sometimes, the bravest thing you can do is choose your wellbeing over being right.

That feeling is incredibly common—and also incredibly powerful. It can keep people stuck for years. But it’s built on a few mental shortcuts that feel true without actually being helpful or accurate.

1. “I wasted so many years”

This is what CBT would call the sunk cost fallacy.

The mind says:
“I’ve already invested so much, I can’t walk away now.”

But here’s the reality:

  • The time is already gone, whether you stay or leave

  • Staying longer doesn’t “recover” those years

  • It only adds more years on top of them

A more balanced thought might be:
“I invested those years trying to make something work. That effort still counts—but it doesn’t mean I have to keep investing.”

You didn’t waste time—you learned, even if painfully:

  • what you tolerate

  • what you need

  • what doesn’t work for you

That’s not nothing. That’s data.

2. “I don’t have time to start over”

This thought is driven by catastrophizing and time scarcity thinking.

It assumes:

  • Starting over = huge, overwhelming, almost impossible

  • Staying = safer, even if miserable

But “starting over” is often a misleading phrase. You’re not going back to zero.

You are:

  • older, yes—but also wiser

  • more self-aware

  • clearer about what you want

A more realistic reframe:
“I’m not starting from scratch. I’m starting from experience.”

Also worth asking gently:
Would you rather spend the next 5–10 years in something that doesn’t work… or use that time to build something that might?

3. “I will be a failure”

This is labeling—turning a situation into an identity.

Ending a relationship becomes:

  • not a decision

  • not a mismatch

  • but a personal flaw

But relationships ending is not failure. It’s actually:

  • incredibly common

  • often necessary

  • sometimes the healthiest choice available

A more balanced thought:
“This relationship didn’t work out. That doesn’t define my worth or my ability to have a good relationship in the future.”

4. “People will look down on me”

This combines mind reading and social anxiety bias.

You’re predicting:

  • what others think

  • how harshly they judge

  • how much they care

But in reality:

  • most people are far more focused on their own lives

  • many people respect someone who leaves an unhappy situation

  • and even if someone judges… that doesn’t make them right

A useful question here:
“Whose opinion actually matters to me—and would they truly want me to stay unhappy just to look ‘successful’?”

What’s Underneath All of This?

When you put these thoughts together, they often point to deeper themes:

  • Fear of regret (“What if I made the wrong choice all along?”)

  • Fear of starting again (uncertainty feels dangerous)

  • Need for external validation (wanting life to “look right” to others)

  • Difficulty letting go of identity (being “someone in a long-term relationship”)

None of these make you weak. They make you human.

A Different Way to See It

Instead of this:

“If I leave, I wasted years, failed, and people will judge me.”

Try something more grounded:

“I stayed and tried. That matters. Now I’m allowed to choose what’s right for me going forward—even if it’s hard, even if others don’t understand.”

A Practical CBT Exercise

When this fear shows up, write it down in 3 columns:

1. Thought:
“I wasted my time and I’ll be a failure if I leave.”

2. Evidence for:

  • I stayed a long time

  • It didn’t work

3. Evidence against:

  • I learned important things

  • Many relationships end and people still go on to have healthy ones

  • Staying unhappy longer doesn’t fix the past

Balanced thought:
“I invested time in something that didn’t work out. That’s painful, but it doesn’t make me a failure—and I still have choices.”

The real risk isn’t that people will judge you.

The real risk is building a life based on avoiding judgment instead of pursuing wellbeing.

Because at the end of the day, the question isn’t: “How does this look?”

It’s: “Can I live like this—and be okay?”

If the answer is:  that’s not failure.   That’s clarity.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding High-Conflict Behaviour after separation

  After separation, it is not uncommon for one parent to become highly conflictual, creating disputes that appear unnecessary or disproporti...